Well, yes. It is very narrow view of the song. Basically it really tells one of the views correctly but like you said, leaves the others, equally "important", views without notice.
But even tho it has that one view right, it's way too literal with certain lines. He/she wants to those lines to mean what he has written. By my recollection, there is practically no connection between certain lines and the analyzes. It seems like those lines are "analyzed" just to support the one view, which would be clear even without those extra proofs.
I somewhat agree with the overall view (keeping in mind the other views, too) but the details... they are too out there...
|
02-06-2007, 01:16 AM
Threaded Mode